Skip to content

Search

Latest Stories

Supreme Court vacates ‘tester lawsuit’ case

The court ruling said the subject of standing for ADA lawsuits filed by plaintiffs who had no intention of staying at the hotel being sued remains open

Supreme Court vacates ‘tester lawsuit’ case

THE U.S. SUPREME Court has “vacated as moot” a case that experts in the hospitality industry said could have set a precedent making it harder to file a “tester lawsuit" against hotels for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. However, in its decision the court said it may still in the future address the core issue of the case, whether a person can file an ADA lawsuit against a hotel even if they have no intention of staying at that hotel.

The case, Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, was originally filed by Deborah Laufer against Acheson Hotels in Maine. Laufer had sued saying the hotels in the case had failed to state on their websites whether they had accessible rooms for the disabled.


“After a lower court sanctioned her lawyer, Laufer voluntarily dismissed her pending suits, including her case against Acheson Hotels, LLC, and filed a suggestion of mootness in this court,” the court said. “Though Laufer’s case is moot, the circuit split on the issue briefed and argued in this court is very much alive.”

In her summary of the court’s decision, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said Laufer had established a pattern of filing similar lawsuits.

“Deborah Laufer has sued hundreds of hotels whose websites failed to state whether they have rooms accessible to the disabled. As the sheer number of lawsuits suggests, she does not focus her efforts on hotels where she has any thought of staying, much less booking a room,” Barrett said. “Instead, Laufer systematically searches the web to find hotels that fail to provide accessibility information and sues to force compliance with the ADA.”

Also, in July, Laufer’s lawyer, Tristan Gillespie, was banned from practicing law for defrauding hotels by lying in fee petitions and during settlement negotiations, Barrett wrote. For example, Gillespie demanded $10,000 in attorney’s fees per case while using “boilerplate complaints” and he paid the father of Laufer’s grandchild for investigatory work that he never performed.

But it was the matter of standing that brought the case to the Supreme Court, Barrett said.

“Laufer has singlehandedly generated a circuit split,” Barrett said. “The Second, Fifth, and Tenth Circuits have held that she lacks standing; the First, Fourth, and Eleventh Circuits have held that she has it. We took this case from the First Circuit to resolve the split.”

In the end, though, Laufer voluntarily dismissed her pending suits but still asked the court to rule on the idea of the lawsuit’s standing in the courts, Barrett said. However, the justice said the court chose not to do so.

“We are sensitive to Acheson’s concern about litigants manipulating the jurisdiction of this Court. We are not convinced, however, that Laufer abandoned her case in an effort to evade our review,” Barrett said. “She voluntarily dismissed her pending ADA cases after a lower court sanctioned her lawyer. She represented to this court that she will not file any others. Laufer’s case against Acheson is moot, and we dismiss it on that ground. We emphasize, however, that we might exercise our discretion differently in a future case.”

All eyes were on this case

In the August issue of Asian Hospitality, Chip Rogers, president and CEO of the American Hotel & Lodging Association, and Laura Lee Blake, president and CEO of AAHOA said the Acheson case held the greatest potential for establishing legal control over tester lawsuits, also known as “drive-by” or “click-by” lawsuits.

“I think most everybody is looking at this Supreme Court case,” Rogers said. “Years ago, when I was at AAHOA, we were able to support legislation in the House of Representatives and effectively pass the House but never had a hearing in the Senate. That would have allowed a cure period. If someone accuses you of violating the ADA, you would have been given an opportunity to correct anything if that was in fact not within the ADA standards. That was the furthest that any piece of legislation had ever made it.”

Blake held a similar opinion of the importance of the case.

“Given the increasing ADA lawsuits that have been filed against hotels, this is an important case because it could potentially limit the types of litigants and claims that will be allowed,” Blake said.

In a statement following the Supreme Court’s decision to declare the case moot, Rogers said the decision still sends a message to serial ADA lawsuit filers.

“Tester lawsuits, in which plaintiffs file hundreds of legal complaints against hotels seeking quick settlements, have become a cottage industry in the United States. In this case, a hotel decided to fight this scheme and in doing so shed light on the extortive practice,” Rogers said. “The Americans with Disabilities Act is a critical civil rights law, but this case was never about legal compliance. It was about whether serial litigants with no intention of becoming hotel guests have standing to sue hotels. While we would have welcomed a broader ruling, the Supreme Court today sent a message to other serial litigants against ‘manipulating the jurisdiction of the [Supreme Court],’ and revealed how the court ‘might exercise its discretion differently in a future case.’ Because Acheson and the hotel industry fought back, the plaintiff dismissed hundreds of suits against hotels and vowed to the court she would never again bring these types of claims. This will bring some solace to small business hoteliers who for years have been victimized by drive-by and click-by tester lawsuits.”

More for you

WTTC travel report

WTTC: U.S. tops travel sector with $2.6T GDP

Summary:

  • The U.S. led global travel and tourism in 2024 with $2.6 trillion in GDP, WTTC reported.
  • India retained ninth place with $249.3 billion in GDP.
  • The sector supported 357 million jobs in 2024, rising to 371 million in 2025.

THE U.S. LED global travel and tourism in 2024, contributing $2.6 trillion to GDP, mainly from domestic demand, according to the World Travel & Tourism Council. Europe accounted for five of the top 10 destinations, while India ranked 9th.

Keep ReadingShow less
Park Hyatt luxury hotel celebrating 45th anniversary
Photo credit: Hyatt Hotels Corp.

Park Hyatt hits 45 years

Summary:

  • Hyatt Hotels Corp. marked 45 years of its Park Hyatt brand.
  • It recently launched “Luxury Is Personal,” its first global campaign in more than five years.
  • Its luxury hotel portfolio has grown 146 percent since 2017.

HYATT HOTELS CORP. marked the 45th anniversary of its Park Hyatt brand, launched in 1980 with Park Hyatt Chicago. It also introduced “Luxury Is Personal,” its first global marketing campaign for the brand in more than five years.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. government shutdown 2025 news
Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Trump, Congress face shutdown deadline

Summary:

  • President Donald Trump will meet Congress as a shutdown looms.
  • Democrats say they are ready to negotiate a bipartisan deal.
  • Thousands of federal jobs and the U.S. travel economy are at risk if a shutdown occurs.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP will meet Congressional leaders on Monday after Senate Democrats rejected a Republican stopgap spending bill to fund the government until Nov. 21. The U.S. Travel Association recently warned a government shutdown could cost the travel economy $1 billion a week.

Keep ReadingShow less
IHG Ruby Hotels USA launch
Photo credit: IHG Hotels & Resorts

IHG’s Ruby debuts in U.S. market

Summary:

  • IHG launched its 20th global brand, Ruby, in the U.S.
  • The brand offers serves city-centers and urban locations with restrictions.
  • It focuses on major urban markets with new-build, conversion, and adaptive reuse.

IHG HOTELS & RESORTS introduced Ruby Hotels, its 20th global brand, to the U.S. It is designed to fit in city centers and urban locations with entry barriers and space constraints.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump H1B visa fee India
Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Trump’s $100K H-1B fee sparks panic in India

Summary:

  • Announcement of $100,000 H-1B visa fee triggers panic among Indian professionals.
  • The fee applies only to new petitions.
  • IT companies are reportedly reviewing staffing and travel.

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S announcement of a $100,000 fee for new H-1B visa petitions, effective Sept. 21, reportedly triggered panic among Indian H-1B holders. Many rushed to book last-minute flights, resulting in fully booked planes and higher fares.

Keep ReadingShow less