The court ruling said the subject of standing for ADA lawsuits filed by plaintiffs who had no intention of staying at the hotel being sued remains open
Ed Brock is an award-winning journalist who has worked for various U.S. newspapers and magazines, including with American City & County magazine, a national publication based in Atlanta focused on city and county government issues. He is currently senior editor at Asian Hospitality magazine, the top U.S. publication for Asian American hoteliers. Originally from Mobile, Alabama, Ed began his career in journalism in the early 1990s as a reporter for a chain of weekly newspapers in Baldwin County, Alabama. After a stint teaching English in Japan, Ed returned to the U.S. and moved to the Atlanta area where he returned to journalism, coming to work at Asian Hospitality in 2016.
THE U.S. SUPREME Court has “vacated as moot” a case that experts in the hospitality industry said could have set a precedent making it harder to file a “tester lawsuit" against hotels for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. However, in its decision the court said it may still in the future address the core issue of the case, whether a person can file an ADA lawsuit against a hotel even if they have no intention of staying at that hotel.
The case, Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, was originally filed by Deborah Laufer against Acheson Hotels in Maine. Laufer had sued saying the hotels in the case had failed to state on their websites whether they had accessible rooms for the disabled.
“After a lower court sanctioned her lawyer, Laufer voluntarily dismissed her pending suits, including her case against Acheson Hotels, LLC, and filed a suggestion of mootness in this court,” the court said. “Though Laufer’s case is moot, the circuit split on the issue briefed and argued in this court is very much alive.”
In her summary of the court’s decision, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said Laufer had established a pattern of filing similar lawsuits.
“Deborah Laufer has sued hundreds of hotels whose websites failed to state whether they have rooms accessible to the disabled. As the sheer number of lawsuits suggests, she does not focus her efforts on hotels where she has any thought of staying, much less booking a room,” Barrett said. “Instead, Laufer systematically searches the web to find hotels that fail to provide accessibility information and sues to force compliance with the ADA.”
Also, in July, Laufer’s lawyer, Tristan Gillespie, was banned from practicing law for defrauding hotels by lying in fee petitions and during settlement negotiations, Barrett wrote. For example, Gillespie demanded $10,000 in attorney’s fees per case while using “boilerplate complaints” and he paid the father of Laufer’s grandchild for investigatory work that he never performed.
But it was the matter of standing that brought the case to the Supreme Court, Barrett said.
“Laufer has singlehandedly generated a circuit split,” Barrett said. “The Second, Fifth, and Tenth Circuits have held that she lacks standing; the First, Fourth, and Eleventh Circuits have held that she has it. We took this case from the First Circuit to resolve the split.”
In the end, though, Laufer voluntarily dismissed her pending suits but still asked the court to rule on the idea of the lawsuit’s standing in the courts, Barrett said. However, the justice said the court chose not to do so.
“We are sensitive to Acheson’s concern about litigants manipulating the jurisdiction of this Court. We are not convinced, however, that Laufer abandoned her case in an effort to evade our review,” Barrett said. “She voluntarily dismissed her pending ADA cases after a lower court sanctioned her lawyer. She represented to this court that she will not file any others. Laufer’s case against Acheson is moot, and we dismiss it on that ground. We emphasize, however, that we might exercise our discretion differently in a future case.”
All eyes were on this case
In the August issue of Asian Hospitality, Chip Rogers, president and CEO of the American Hotel & Lodging Association, and Laura Lee Blake, president and CEO of AAHOA said the Acheson case held the greatest potential for establishing legal control over tester lawsuits, also known as “drive-by” or “click-by” lawsuits.
“I think most everybody is looking at this Supreme Court case,” Rogers said. “Years ago, when I was at AAHOA, we were able to support legislation in the House of Representatives and effectively pass the House but never had a hearing in the Senate. That would have allowed a cure period. If someone accuses you of violating the ADA, you would have been given an opportunity to correct anything if that was in fact not within the ADA standards. That was the furthest that any piece of legislation had ever made it.”
Blake held a similar opinion of the importance of the case.
“Given the increasing ADA lawsuits that have been filed against hotels, this is an important case because it could potentially limit the types of litigants and claims that will be allowed,” Blake said.
In a statement following the Supreme Court’s decision to declare the case moot, Rogers said the decision still sends a message to serial ADA lawsuit filers.
“Tester lawsuits, in which plaintiffs file hundreds of legal complaints against hotels seeking quick settlements, have become a cottage industry in the United States. In this case, a hotel decided to fight this scheme and in doing so shed light on the extortive practice,” Rogers said. “The Americans with Disabilities Act is a critical civil rights law, but this case was never about legal compliance. It was about whether serial litigants with no intention of becoming hotel guests have standing to sue hotels. While we would have welcomed a broader ruling, the Supreme Court today sent a message to other serial litigants against ‘manipulating the jurisdiction of the [Supreme Court],’ and revealed how the court ‘might exercise its discretion differently in a future case.’ Because Acheson and the hotel industry fought back, the plaintiff dismissed hundreds of suits against hotels and vowed to the court she would never again bring these types of claims. This will bring some solace to small business hoteliers who for years have been victimized by drive-by and click-by tester lawsuits.”
The U.S. led global travel and tourism in 2024 with $2.6 trillion in GDP, WTTC reported.
India retained ninth place with $249.3 billion in GDP.
The sector supported 357 million jobs in 2024, rising to 371 million in 2025.
THE U.S. LED global travel and tourism in 2024, contributing $2.6 trillion to GDP, mainly from domestic demand, according to the World Travel & Tourism Council. Europe accounted for five of the top 10 destinations, while India ranked 9th.
WTTC opened its 25th Global Summit in Rome with research showing investment reached $1 trillion in 2024, led by the U.S., China, Saudi Arabia and France.
“These results tell a story of strength and opportunity,” said Gloria Guevara, WTTC interim CEO. “The U.S. remains the world’s largest travel and tourism market, China is surging back, Europe is powering ahead, and destinations across the Middle East, Asia and Africa are delivering record growth. This year, we are forecasting that our sector will contribute a historic $2.1 trillion in 2025, surpassing the previous high of $1.9 trillion in 2019. As Italy hosts this year’s Global Summit, its role as a G7 leader showcases the importance of tourism in driving economies, creating jobs and shaping our shared future.”
The U.S. kept its top position, but international visitor spending is expected to fall by $12.5 billion in 2025, limiting growth to 0.7 percent. China, the second-largest market, contributed $1.64 trillion in 2024 and is forecast to grow 22.7 percent this year. Japan, the fifth-largest market, is expected to rise from $310.5 billion to nearly $325 billion.
Italy, which hosted the summit and is a G7 member, contributed $248.3 billion in 2024, driven by international visitors and the meetings and events sector. Germany, the third-largest market, contributed $525 billion. The UK generated $367 billion despite a fall in international visitor spending, while France and Spain added $289 billion and $270 billion. Europe’s growth was supported by both cultural and modern sectors.
India contributed $249.3 billion in 2024. In June, WTTC reported international visitors spent $36.09 billion in India in last year, up 9 percent from 2019.
Jobs on the rise
Travel and tourism supported 357 million jobs in 2024 and is expected to reach 371 million in 2025, increasing its share of global employment, the WTTC report found. By 2035, the sector is projected to support one in eight jobs worldwide, adding 91 million positions—most in Asia-Pacific—and accounting for one in three new jobs globally.
Uncertainties over trade tariffs and geopolitical tensions could limit sector growth in 2025, the report said. Travel and tourism’s GDP contribution is forecast to rise 6.7 percent, returning toward pre-pandemic averages but still outpacing the 2.5 percent growth projected for the global economy.
The sector is expected to contribute $11.7 trillion, or 10.3 percent of global GDP and add 14.4 million jobs, bringing total employment to 371 million, or 10.9 percent of global jobs. International visitor spending is projected to fully recover, rising 8.6 percent above 2019 levels to nearly $2.1 trillion, while domestic visitor spending is expected to rise 13.6 percent to $5.6 trillion. Annual growth for 2025 is forecast at 10 percent for international and 5.1 percent for domestic spending.
In May, WTTC projected the U.S. stood to lose $12.5 billion in international travel spending this year, falling to under $169 billion from $181 billion in 2024. The council said U.S. needs to do more to welcome international visitors rather than “putting up the ‘closed’ sign.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Asian Media
Group USA Inc. and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Hyatt Hotels Corp. marked 45 years of its Park Hyatt brand.
It recently launched “Luxury Is Personal,” its first global campaign in more than five years.
Its luxury hotel portfolio has grown 146 percent since 2017.
HYATT HOTELS CORP. marked the 45th anniversary of its Park Hyatt brand, launched in 1980 with Park Hyatt Chicago. It also introduced “Luxury Is Personal,” its first global marketing campaign for the brand in more than five years.
“The Park Hyatt campaign celebrates luxury not just as a grand performance, but as an intimate convergence of refined details that resonate long after the stay,” said Katie Johnson, Hyatt’s vice president and global brand leader for luxury. “As we celebrate 45 years of Park Hyatt hotels, we are proud of the personal touch we bring to serving our guests and members and can’t wait to breathe new life into the brand as we head into our next chapter.”
The campaign coincides with Hyatt’s expansion of the Park Hyatt brand across Europe, Africa, Asia-Pacific and the Americas, the statement said. Hyatt reports its luxury hotel portfolio has grown 146 percent since 2017 and includes Park Hyatt, Alila and The Unbound Collection by Hyatt.
A recent Hyatt Inclusive Collection survey found that most Americans define quality time as moments with loved ones, but 82 percent say they don’t get enough.
President Donald Trump will meet Congress as a shutdown looms.
Democrats say they are ready to negotiate a bipartisan deal.
Thousands of federal jobs and the U.S. travel economy are at risk if a shutdown occurs.
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP will meet Congressional leaders on Monday after Senate Democrats rejected a Republican stopgap spending bill to fund the government until Nov. 21. The U.S. Travel Association recently warned a government shutdown could cost the travel economy $1 billion a week.
Democrats want spending bills to reverse Trump’s Medicaid cuts, while Republicans want healthcare addressed in broader budget talks, according to Al Jazeera.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune are expected to meet Trump at the White House.
“If it has to shut down, it’ll have to shut down. But they’re the ones that are shutting down government,” Trump told ABC News.
Democrats shifted the blame to Trump but also kept the door open to negotiations.
“President Trump has once again agreed to a meeting in the Oval Office,” the Democratic leaders said. “As we have repeatedly said, Democrats will meet anywhere, at any time and with anyone to negotiate a bipartisan spending agreement that meets the needs of the American people. We are resolute in our determination to avoid a government shutdown and address the Republican healthcare crisis. Time is running out.”
The government will shut down Wednesday if Congress doesn’t pass a short-term spending bill. The Senate could vote Monday on an extension Democrats previously rejected, The Wall Street Journal reported.
The White House warned that thousands of government jobs could be at risk if the government shuts down at midnight Tuesday. In a memo to federal agencies, the administration said Reduction-in-Force plans would go beyond standard furloughs, according to POLITICO.
Trump reportedly warned Sunday of widespread layoffs if the government shuts down this week.
“We are going to cut a lot of the people that … we’re able to cut on a permanent basis,” he said.
More than 100,000 federal employees could lose their jobs as early as Tuesday if the government shuts down, India’s Times Now reported.
A shutdown would disrupt federal agencies, including the TSA and hurt the travel economy, USTA CEO Geoff Freeman wrote in a Sept. 25 letter to Congress.
A recent Ipsos survey cited in the USTA letter found 60 percent of Americans would cancel or avoid air travel during a shutdown. About 81 percent said shutdowns harm the economy and inconvenience travelers and 88 percent said Congress should act across party lines to prevent one.
IHG launched its 20th global brand, Ruby, in the U.S.
The brand offers serves city-centers and urban locations with restrictions.
It focuses on major urban markets with new-build, conversion, and adaptive reuse.
IHG HOTELS & RESORTS introduced Ruby Hotels, its 20th global brand, to the U.S. It is designed to fit in city centers and urban locations with entry barriers and space constraints.
The company’s growth plan will focus on major urban markets and include new-build, conversion and adaptive reuse projects, IHG said in a statement.
“Ruby is a brand built for the future of hospitality,” said Jolyon Bulley, IHG's CEO for the Americas. “Its success in Europe speaks to the growing demand for flexible, lifestyle-focused hotels in highly traveled locations. Ruby’s U.S. introduction will complement our premium portfolio and offer owners a differentiated product with strong economics and scalable growth potential. We’re encouraged by the initial interest and buzz around Ruby, which reinforces our confidence in its appeal and ability to thrive in this market.”
Ruby, founded in Germany in 2013, joined the IHG portfolio earlier this year and has 34 open or pipeline hotels in European cities. The U.S. launch reflects IHG’s plan to grow the brand to more than 120 hotels in the next decade and more than 250 in 20 years.
Lauren Krostue, Ruby's vice president for global brand management, said Ruby allows IHG to connect with a new type of traveler—those who value unique stays at an accessible price point.
"In bringing Ruby to the U.S., we will retain what’s made the brand so special in Europe—including its unique design and operating model—while localizing certain elements to reflect market needs," she said. "We look forward to introducing the Ruby experience to a new group of owners and guests and showcasing what sets the brand apart in the increasingly popular ‘urban micro’ segment.”
IHG nearly doubled global conversion signings from 2023 to 2024, with conversions representing about 60 percent of openings and 40 percent of signings in the first quarter of 2025.
Announcement of $100,000 H-1B visa fee triggers panic among Indian professionals.
The fee applies only to new petitions.
IT companies are reportedly reviewing staffing and travel.
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S announcement of a $100,000 fee for new H-1B visa petitions, effective Sept. 21, reportedly triggered panic among Indian H-1B holders. Many rushed to book last-minute flights, resulting in fully booked planes and higher fares.
The move caused anxiety among IT employees whose work depends on U.S. assignments, according to India Today.
However, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services later clarified that the fee applies only to new petitions, not existing visa holders, providing some relief but not ending widespread uncertainty.
Airports and travel agents reported a surge in cancellations and rescheduling requests, while families of visa holders faced disruptions during the festive season.
Friday’s announcement sparked further confusion, culminating in chaotic scenes aboard an Emirates flight from San Francisco to Dubai, AeroTime reported. The plane was held on the tarmac for three hours as H-1B holders tried to determine if they could re-enter the U.S. The policy change created confusion over who would be affected.
India’s external affairs ministry said the fee could have humanitarian consequences “by disrupting families.” The Indian government said it “hopes these disruptions can be addressed by U.S. authorities” and emphasized that the exchange of skilled workers has “contributed enormously” to both nations, The Guardian reported.
H-1B visas are valid for three years and can be renewed for another three. The Trump administration says the increased fee helps U.S. companies stay competitive and create more jobs. However, Indian stakeholders raised concerns about its impact on the IT sector, citing potential disruptions to operations and project timelines. IT companies are reportedly reviewing staffing and travel while managing higher compliance requirements.
“Service exports have finally been dragged into the global trade and tech war,” Madhavi Arora, chief economist at Emkay Global Financial Services, wrote in a note on Sunday, according to CNN.
Arora also suggested the policy could have an unexpected upside for India, potentially bringing talent back home. While it could concentrate top professionals within India’s largest tech firms, it could also “catalyze India’s transformation into a more powerful global innovation and delivery hub.”
Meanwhile, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services data for fiscal 2025, show Amazon as the top H-1B recipient, securing about 10,000 visas.
The recent 50 percent tariff imposed by the Trump administration on India was also met with backlash from the country.