Skip to content

Search

Latest Stories

NLRB issues final rule on joint-employer status

The board clarifies when one company has ‘substantial control’ over another company’s employees

THE NATIONAL LABOR Relations Board has issued its final rule on defining joint-employer status. The rule is meant to settle confusion over franchisers’ responsibilities for their franchisees’ employees.

The NLRB ruling comes less than two months after the U.S. Department of Labor updated the Fair Labor Standards Act to clarify the definition of joint-employer status. Much like the Labor Department, the NLRB rule dictates that “a business must possess and exercise substantial direct and immediate control over one or more essential terms and conditions of employment of another employer’s employees” to be considered a joint employer.


The rule also spells out specific definitions for terms such as considered “essential terms and conditions of employment” and “substantial direct and immediate control,” in the latter case excluding control exercised sporadically or in isolated cases. If there is evidence that a company has indirect or “contractually reserved” control over another company’s employees, that can lead to a finding that the company is a joint employer if there also is a case of direct control. Also, certain routine parts of an arms-length contract cannot be used to define a contractor as a joint-employer under the new rule.

“This final rule gives our joint-employer standard the clarity, stability, and predictability that is essential to any successful labor-management relationship and vital to our national economy,” said John Ring, NLRB chairman, in a statement. “With the completion of today’s rule, employers will now have certainty in structuring their business relationships, employees will have a better understanding of their employment circumstances, and unions will have clarity regarding with whom they have a collective-bargaining relationship.”

The board’s definition of joint-employer status has been in limbo since Feb. 26, 2018, when the NLRB vacated its 2017 decision in Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors Ltd. and Brandt Construction Co. in response to a court finding that one of the board members had a conflict of interest in that case. As a result, the board’s definition on joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act reverts to the 2015 Browning-Ferris Industries case, which the Hy-Brand decision had overruled.

The NLRB final rule is a victory for the entire franchise business model, said Cecil Staton, AAHOA president and CEO, in a statement.

“The disastrous Browning-Ferris Industries decision upended the franchise industry. That hasty and partisan decision failed to acknowledge or reflect the economic realities of the franchise business model and created great uncertainty about an owner’s liabilities regarding control over his or her employees and third-party contractors,” Staton said.  “Today, owners of franchised businesses finally have a joint employer standard that is stable and clear. They can structure their business relationships with a new degree of certainty. The NLRB final rule on the joint employer standard just makes sense. Owners, employees, and unions now have clear lines about how these business relationships are structured. This is vital to the continued viability of the franchise business model, our nation’s economic growth, and job creation.”

The NLRB received almost 29,000 comments on the rule during the public comment period.

More for you

AHLA Foundation awards $710K in scholarships

AHLA Foundation awards $710K in scholarships

Summary:

  • AHLA Foundation distributed $710,000 in scholarships to 246 students.
  • Nearly 90 percent of recipients come from underrepresented communities.
  • The foundation funds students pursuing education and careers in the lodging sector.

AHLA FOUNDATION DISTRIBUTED $710,000 in academic scholarships to 246 students at 64 schools nationwide for the 2025–2026 academic year. Nearly 90 percent of recipients are from underrepresented communities, reflecting the foundation’s focus on expanding access to hospitality careers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congressional deadlock shutters government
Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Congressional deadlock shutters government

Summary:

  • The U.S. government shut down at midnight after Congress failed to agree on funding.
  • About 750,000 federal employees will be furloughed daily, costing $400 million.
  • Key immigration and labor programs are halted.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT shut down at midnight after Republicans and Democrats failed to agree on funding. Disputes over healthcare subsidies and spending priorities left both sides unwilling to accept responsibility.

Keep ReadingShow less
WTTC travel report

WTTC: U.S. tops travel sector with $2.6T GDP

Summary:

  • The U.S. led global travel and tourism in 2024 with $2.6 trillion in GDP, WTTC reported.
  • India retained ninth place with $249.3 billion in GDP.
  • The sector supported 357 million jobs in 2024, rising to 371 million in 2025.

THE U.S. LED global travel and tourism in 2024, contributing $2.6 trillion to GDP, mainly from domestic demand, according to the World Travel & Tourism Council. Europe accounted for five of the top 10 destinations, while India ranked 9th.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. government shutdown 2025 news
Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Trump, Congress face shutdown deadline

Summary:

  • President Donald Trump will meet Congress as a shutdown looms.
  • Democrats say they are ready to negotiate a bipartisan deal.
  • Thousands of federal jobs and the U.S. travel economy are at risk if a shutdown occurs.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP will meet Congressional leaders on Monday after Senate Democrats rejected a Republican stopgap spending bill to fund the government until Nov. 21. The U.S. Travel Association recently warned a government shutdown could cost the travel economy $1 billion a week.

Keep ReadingShow less